My husband wants to carry on the tradition of his family and name our baby, if it's a boy, after him, John.
I hate the idea of naming a kid after yourself. I told him that when we were dating. I'm willing to compromise by having John be the middle name. So, he wants John Henry and I want Henry John. there is just no way in hell I'll name a son John. I'll also put in that his dad's name is Alex and so is his nephew and it's annoying and confusing. John was his grandfather, he was named after him yet he goes on about the tradition. I'd also like to point out that I have a son from another relationship who knows the truth but John is the only father he has ever known.
so, besides the fact I hate the tradition all together, it's not even a real tradition, I don't like the name, it's too boring and uncreative, how will that make our son feel if we have a boy and he gets named after his dad when our current son doesn't even have the same last name. Doesn't that send the message that the baby is more important because he's blood? he already has low self esteem and depression issues.
Mostly I'm just curious of your opinion on the matter, plus, if it really is a boy, I need a good solid argument to win with the compromise (I've already agreed to one middle name if it's a boy where myself and our three kids all have two.)