ext_40652 (
ouronlylight.livejournal.com) wrote in
babynames2006-10-24 06:24 pm
Sutton Pierce, I mean, Jayden James Federline
According to People, Britney Spears and Kevin Federline have named their second son Jayden James, and not Sutton Pierce as previously believed.
So, thoughts? I don't like the double Jay sound at the beginning of both names, but the fact that it doesn't alliterate with Sean Preston makes it a billion times better in my book.
[Poll #852434]
So, thoughts? I don't like the double Jay sound at the beginning of both names, but the fact that it doesn't alliterate with Sean Preston makes it a billion times better in my book.
[Poll #852434]
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I'm not a fan of either name, but I like Sutton better, and it seems classier.
Sean is a really trashy name to me, and Jayden would match that.
I adore Britney and I wish she weren't with that creep.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
its too bad, sutton was tolerable.
no subject
Anyway, while I don't think all -aydens are trashy and made up, I see what you mean.
no subject
Interesting.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Jayden is horrible. Blech.
no subject
Jayden James is wayyyy better, besides he'd have the nickname JJ :)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Please. Oh please.
no subject
no subject
I personally wouldn't use Sutton, but it's okay.
no subject
no subject
Sutton isnt my style, but it's ok :)
no subject
no subject