[identity profile] ewaeva.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] babynames

ETA: Woot! Thanks for the solidarity, all. Non-cute name lovers represent!

Question. 

In so many threads in this community, I see comments by people who love the name [Sailor or Sunshine or Kylee or Ainsley or whatever] because "it's so cute!" or, "just adorable!" or, "so sweet for a little girl! I'm adding it to my list!"

Why? WHY is this a criteria? I don't get it.

"Cuteness" is not one of my criteria in choosing a name. I myself would not want to have a name that is "cute" or "adorable," or "sweet on a little girl," because those qualities are not exactly what I want to be associated with.

Why do people choose a name because it's "cute for a little girl"? Little girls grow up. Do they want their daughters to be "cute," "sweet," or "adorable" women? I sure don't. I want them to be strong and smart and confident, and I will give them names that I think reflect that.

It also bothers me that the criteria of "it's so adorable for a little boy" is much less often brought up. Because GIRLS are supposed to be "sweet." 

That's it.

Date: 2006-08-14 02:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hitzpink.livejournal.com
Because people seem to think that they're giving birth to daughters who will forever remain little girls and therefore it's ok to name her something cutesy like that. I agree with you, it bugs me so much. One of the first things I do when deciding to add a name to my list is picture it on a grown woman. If I can't I don't add it, no matter how adorable it is on a 3 year old.

Date: 2006-08-14 02:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] myfriendjenny.livejournal.com
Yeah, I tend to think the really cutesy names should be used only on pets!
;-)

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526 2728  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 25th, 2026 11:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios