squee!! How CUUUUTE!
Aug. 14th, 2006 10:26 amETA: Woot! Thanks for the solidarity, all. Non-cute name lovers represent!
Question.
In so many threads in this community, I see comments by people who love the name [Sailor or Sunshine or Kylee or Ainsley or whatever] because "it's so cute!" or, "just adorable!" or, "so sweet for a little girl! I'm adding it to my list!"
Why? WHY is this a criteria? I don't get it.
"Cuteness" is not one of my criteria in choosing a name. I myself would not want to have a name that is "cute" or "adorable," or "sweet on a little girl," because those qualities are not exactly what I want to be associated with.
Why do people choose a name because it's "cute for a little girl"? Little girls grow up. Do they want their daughters to be "cute," "sweet," or "adorable" women? I sure don't. I want them to be strong and smart and confident, and I will give them names that I think reflect that.
It also bothers me that the criteria of "it's so adorable for a little boy" is much less often brought up. Because GIRLS are supposed to be "sweet."
That's it.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 02:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 02:57 pm (UTC);-)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 02:49 pm (UTC)My favorite girls name also has a cute nn, but it's a nn as well.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 02:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 02:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 02:58 pm (UTC)Preach on, sister! You get an "Amen" from me!
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 03:02 pm (UTC)If anything I avoid 'cute' names, because they usually don't age well. I mean who the hell wants a 'sweet' name when they're a thirty year old lawyer?
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 03:06 pm (UTC)I feel for that girl, I really do.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 03:12 pm (UTC)I agree, double standards are sick. But you know people will treat a baby differently based on its sex (girls are cuddled more are words that describe her physical apperance, like "adorable", are used more often), naming is just another thing to tack onto it.
I like feminine names. I'll like a name because it sounds very soft and "pretty", but I'd never like a name based on "cuteness"... that's for pets. I like "pretty" boys names too, though, so no double standard here.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 05:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 08:04 pm (UTC)(But I have seen the 'adorable' comment quite a few times for boy's names. It's equally ick, to me.)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 10:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 10:49 pm (UTC)Meanwhile, there are so many cute names I think would be great on pets.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 11:07 pm (UTC)i hope people who name their baby daughters Candi and shit like that have daughters who grow up to be tattooed biker chicks with multi-colored mohawks! :)
(not that there's anything wrong with being that way; most of my friends are like that)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 11:42 pm (UTC)The reason I hate Emily is because of the cute feeling I get from it, and the shy feeling I get from it. I certainly don't want my daughters to be shy wallflowers.
Good post.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-14 11:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 12:54 am (UTC)That said, I do think people ought to consider how a name will fit a person at all ages. Heck, you rarely see a little girl named Agatha, Mildred or Barbara these days, and they sound "old." To me, anyway.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 02:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 06:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-15 07:21 pm (UTC)