[identity profile] lostrocket.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] babynames
I was catching up on old entries and was highly amused by the link to Utah Baby Names (that link goes to the post, not the site, sorry).

From there I found this little article which should probably be the manifesto of this community, or something:

The Nayme Gaimme.

Date: 2006-08-24 11:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarahrose.livejournal.com
Well, it just comes down to opinion, I guess.

Date: 2006-08-25 12:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] turabiannights.livejournal.com
Well, to a point. I know one woman on the internet who INSISTED to me that her daughter Maydson's name was pronounced "madison." But it's not - there's no way in English phonetics that that can be. It's "maidson." I think it's one thing to be okay with alternative spellings, but it's definitely something else to let misspellings like that go. What does it teach our kids? That phonics are flexible?

Date: 2006-08-25 12:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarahrose.livejournal.com
To me, if someone says their name is pronounced a certain way, it is. It's *their* name. While I may not agree with it visually, that's how it is.

I don't think there is such a thing as misspelling names, either.


I'm the biggest Grammar Nazi of all, but what it comes down to is PEOPLE. You have to call them what they say their name is, agreeing or not.

Date: 2006-08-25 12:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] turabiannights.livejournal.com
But you have to draw the line somewhere, don't you? What about the Swedish boy who was almost named Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxvclmnckssqlbb11116? His parents claimed it was pronounced "Albin"... but how could it be? Why can people spell names any way they want, but not words? What's the difference? I feel like the effectiveness of semiotic communication would simply break down at a certain point.

Date: 2006-08-25 12:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarahrose.livejournal.com
I understand your point there, but Madyson is close enough for it to be "acceptable."

Names are different than words. They're proper nouns.


And how else would you pronounce Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxvclmnckssqlbb11116? ;-)

Date: 2006-08-25 01:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarahrose.livejournal.com
*shrug* I don't feel differently about it since this talk started.

For me, it's part of the freedom we Americans are granted as Americans. I'm glad I have the right to name my children names I like - "made up," "misspelled," "mispronounced" or not.

Date: 2006-08-25 12:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poespretty.livejournal.com
I agree. if they had this kind of person, Oprah would be called "Orpha" as her mother intended (there was an error on her birth cert. or something, though I can't remember off the top of my head if it was her moms fault or the person who typed the birth cert.) either way, IMO certain spellings DO change the prn of a name, according to the widely accepted rules of phonics.

Date: 2006-08-25 11:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] krosp.livejournal.com
Actually I think the example given was Maydson, not Madyson... there really is a difference there. Madyson is just another way of spelling Madison that, although trendy, is pronounced the same. Maydson is just wrong, unless you want it to be pronounced maidson. But like you said, if I met this person I would still have to call them "Madison" despite their spelling, since it is how they pronounce their name. I just think altering the spelling of names to the point where they should logically be pronounced some different way is stupid and pointless. You can still completely alter the spelling of a name in a way that keeps the original pronunciation if you do want to be creative.

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526 2728  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 25th, 2026 06:50 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios