I didn't vote. If you spelled it Jackson, that would be my vote. If you're dead set on the x, then my vote's for Keaton as a first name, but I wouldn't but Michael with it. Michael Keaton is an actor.
they sound like tributes to washed-up stars. at least keaton micheal and jaxon micheal do. and they're not even spelled properly. i'm sorry - i think these are horrible names. i would choose joe smith before i chose any of them.
The problem with these names is that they are all four two-syllable words in a row. It sounds like a person walking with a limp across a wooden floor. Maybe change one of the middle names to something shorter or longer. I like the first names in this order: Jaxon, Keegan, Keaton.
Why two middle names? Unless you have some sort of reason for doing so, why do it? For instance, boys in my family are always given the grandmother's maiden names as middle names. So my first son will be John Cory Daniels [last name]. I'm not a fan the double middle name because it usually, I think, makes it sound like you are trying to be faux royalty, i.e., Princess Catherine Amelia Elinor Mary.
The names on their own or couples are beautiful but I'm so dead set against giving children more than three names (first, middle and last). It's sad when you cannot write your whole name out on forms.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-19 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 02:59 pm (UTC)All of them are a mouthful, and I wouldn't pair Michael and Keaton because of the actor.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 03:37 pm (UTC)No Michael Jackson, even it is spelled Jaxon.
Jackson is more classic and will stand the test of time and teasing over Jaxon.
Keegan Michael Stephen Masters is my vote, but that's still a mouthful for a small boy.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 04:29 pm (UTC)i'm sorry - i think these are horrible names. i would choose joe smith before i chose any of them.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 04:47 pm (UTC)There is no reason to spell Jackson with an X. It looks ridiculous, like someone was trying to make it look exxxtra cool by sticking an X in there.
Also, don't give your child a name you don't know how to spell.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 08:36 pm (UTC)keaton michael? michael keaton?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 08:42 pm (UTC)keegan edmond...try saying that 5 times fast. ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-12 05:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-12 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-12 01:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-12 02:42 pm (UTC)ever thought of Keegan Patrick? :)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-19 05:54 pm (UTC)The names on their own or couples are beautiful but I'm so dead set against giving children more than three names (first, middle and last). It's sad when you cannot write your whole name out on forms.