(no subject)
Dec. 28th, 2005 11:09 amMy husband and I are expecting our first child in less than a week, and we're still crunching on names. We do have the middle names down:
River for a girl, Nathan for a boy. We have two girls names picked:
Ainsley River
and
Mackenzie River
and three boys names:
William Nathan
Christopher Nathan
Jacob Nathan
Which are your favorites? Why? Or, if you don't like any of them, why not?
River for a girl, Nathan for a boy. We have two girls names picked:
Ainsley River
and
Mackenzie River
and three boys names:
William Nathan
Christopher Nathan
Jacob Nathan
Which are your favorites? Why? Or, if you don't like any of them, why not?
eek
Date: 2005-12-28 10:25 am (UTC)Is the Mackenzie River thing a joke? (I'm really asking, not being snarky)
If you are not joking, please, please don't name her that. The Mackenzie River is very well known. It is the longest river in Canada (and the second longest in North America after the Mississippi). So it's like naming a kid Mississippi River - even you have some great sentimental attachment to the river, it's still pretty ridiculous.
Check it out on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mackenzie_River
Besides, Mackenzie is a trendy name that will sound very dated in a generation (and IMO last names don't usually make good first names, esp. for girls). Ainsley's nice.
I like all your boys' names.
Re: eek
Date: 2005-12-28 10:34 am (UTC)My husband likes Mackenzie, though, so it might stay there, with a different middle name. Ugh.
Re: eek
Date: 2005-12-28 10:37 am (UTC)I don't like Mackenzie anyway, but if you do use it a different mn would definitely be in order! Something more feminine I'd say...
Congratulations and best of luck with your birth :) You'll probably know what her name is when you see her.
Re: eek
Date: 2005-12-28 10:38 am (UTC)Re: eek
Date: 2005-12-29 01:51 pm (UTC)