in my last post people commented that it'd be horrible to name a kid Galen because it starts with GAY. nobody mentioned that Gabriel also starts with GAY. ;) is it because it's more common? why did we overlook this one?
Page Summary
joonluv.livejournal.com - (no subject)
th3-unicorn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kimber-leigh.livejournal.com - (no subject)
0o-faerie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
th3-unicorn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
confusedanswers.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bluekoala.livejournal.com - (no subject)
indyselsa.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tryyingtoevolve.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Fruit Salad for Leftovers by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 03:32 pm (UTC)I think the fact that Gabriel is more familiar to the majority makes us glide over something that we would notice (and criticize) about something less familiar.
In this case I can also say maybe Gabriel has more syllables to rely on, so that the Gay- sound is more balanced by other sounds, whereas Galen is a little shorter
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 03:48 pm (UTC)now that i've seen it spelled Gaelen, i do like it better..
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 04:04 pm (UTC)Sorry, huge pet peeve. And a completely different discussion.
I still think Galen is a pretty name, but like I said last time, I like it spelled Gaelen better =)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 04:38 pm (UTC)Sorry, huge pet peeve. And a completely different discussion.
you do have a point, though :)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 05:18 pm (UTC)Regardless, Galen is a perfectly fine name.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 07:35 pm (UTC)My guess as to the overlooking of Gabriel is because it's usually shortened to "Gabe." The only way to shorten Galen is "Gay" or "Gail," neither of which are good.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 07:40 pm (UTC)