Children Receiving Mother's Name.
Dec. 12th, 2006 11:20 amI remember reading somewhere that children traditionally were automatically given the surname of the mother.. stemming from Peasant/Noble times. Does this sound familiar to anybody? If I'm wrong, let me know, too. I just know I've heard something at some point or another that goes against traditional belief in society about a child having the father's last name.
ETA: I'm referring mostly to cases where the mother is unwed/kept her maiden name/has a different last name than the father.
ETA: I'm referring mostly to cases where the mother is unwed/kept her maiden name/has a different last name than the father.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 04:48 pm (UTC)My mom did the same thing with me. I lived with her so I had her last name. When I was 3 my parents got married and they changed my last name... no big deal.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 04:50 pm (UTC)For the baby to carry your husbands name, you would have to go through the whole "get parental righst from birth-father, go to court, pay billion fees, etc etc etc". I know several men who instead took teh last name of their wife and new child. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 05:17 pm (UTC)Sorry. This made me mad. I agree with you. And you don't have to have historical reasons and arguments for giving the baby your last name. You're raising him, he's living with you, the father up and left, for crying out loud. You don't need any more reasons than that.
Having said that, yeah, it was normal for kids of unmarried mothers to have their mother's last name. Probably because the father often didn't acknowledge the child as his.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 05:25 pm (UTC)I think the original story I heard sounded like that. Where Noblemen would sleep with Peasant women and when they ended up pregnant, they did not want a child "unworthy" of their status being affiliated with their last name. And, considering it was a time without paternity testing, it was quite easy for them to deny their spawn. But, there was little question as to which woman the baby popped out of - which is why the children would be given her name.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 05:00 pm (UTC)honestly, If I had a child I'd want it to have my last name anyway.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 10:31 pm (UTC)But today, if the father isn't around and doesn't want to support the baby, yeah, I'd say the kid should have the mother's name.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 10:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 11:13 pm (UTC)(PS off topic, but if the icon you have is your babies name to be and your due date, first love the name and second you are due 2 days after me)
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 11:23 pm (UTC)Thank you and congrats on your April baby. :]
no subject
Date: 2006-12-13 04:24 am (UTC)Alternately, you could hyphenate the name and let him/her choose which one they'd like to use. I didn't have that option since I would've been a King-Pitt or Pitt-King!