Mere speculation...
Dec. 8th, 2006 11:45 amI understand that babycenter.com rank for 2006 is speculation as of now, but I was amazed by how popular some of the names I liked for this baby was.
According to babycenter.com... here are the names I liked and their ranking:(
99. Peyton
80. Cooper
77. Parker
75. Brady
64. Tristan
62. Cole
59. Hayden
55. Dominic
41. Christian
32. Landon
22. Brayden
16. Connor
13. Caden
7. Noah
I feel so trendy :S
According to babycenter.com... here are the names I liked and their ranking:(
99. Peyton
80. Cooper
77. Parker
75. Brady
64. Tristan
62. Cole
59. Hayden
55. Dominic
41. Christian
32. Landon
22. Brayden
16. Connor
13. Caden
7. Noah
I feel so trendy :S
no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 04:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 05:01 pm (UTC)so do I
77. Parker
64. Tristan
62. Cole
59. Hayden
55. Dominic
32. Landon
16. Connor
7. Noah
no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 08:02 pm (UTC)Wait... am I in a roundabout way encouraging the use of Landon and Brady? Ugh. I didn't mean to! lol.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-09 01:07 am (UTC)However, I would not recommend naming someone something if it's been the number 1 name for years - there can be too much of a good thing. I guess it's just up to you how popular you are willing to let something be.
Anyway this wasn't fully directed at you, just my response to the idea that it's bad to have a letter after your name.. sorry it ended up so long!
no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 06:02 pm (UTC)I can't believe Landon could be 32. I didn't know it was that popular.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 06:29 pm (UTC)I adore Christian too!
no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 07:51 pm (UTC)The lists can be inaccurate both ways too, i.e. Christian was #31 on the babycenter list last year but was really #22 over the whole country.
Also, especially for girls, the sheer number of names in use in the last few years has skyrocketed, so ranking # isn't necessarily the best way to get a feel for how many of them out there there really are. There's an awesome site for this, http://babynamewizard.com/namevoyager/lnv0105.html, it's an interactive thing where you type in a name and it'll graph the number of people named it every year, and you can find out it's ranking by holding your mouse over a year. So if you look at Emily, for example, it's been #1 for the last three years, but the numbers of little Emilys have gone down by about 500 in the last two or three years. Just somthing to think about.
I hope this wasn't too long, and was interesting
the 2005 lists:
http://www.ssa.gov/cgi-bin/popularnames.cgi
http://www.babycenter.com/general/babynaming/pregnancy/1459677.html
no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 08:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 08:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-09 08:41 pm (UTC)