http://polkadotskirt.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] polkadotskirt.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] babynames2006-08-28 12:31 pm

Rowen

My favourtite boys name at the moment is Rowen. However, I think I would like the middle name of any kids i have (ages away yet) to be the names of my grandparents - BUT Rowen Stephen and Rowen Harry don't sound so good to my ears.

What do you think? do you think that to use a family name is important enough to put up with it sounding less than a perfect pairing? Because Harry and Stephen aren't really my style of first name (want something quite unusual without being stupid and there are loads of harrys and stephens!) but I want to use them I probably would just ignore the fact that they aren't perfect, but I'm just wondering what you all think.

[identity profile] poespretty.livejournal.com 2006-08-28 01:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I think Rowen Stephen sounds good together actually (provided your ln doesn't sound terrible with this combo). personally, I don't like Rowan Harry together at all.

[identity profile] krosp.livejournal.com 2006-08-28 01:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I think they both sound fine, really. Unless your last name also ends with "en", in which case Rowen Stephen ____en would be a bit overboard. I think only you can answer the question of whether naming after family is important enough to put up with a less perfect flow... but I can just say that I don't think either of those names are bad.

Btw I much prefer the spelling Rowan. It's a great name, and I normally hate names with a w in it, but I like this one.

[identity profile] omgpregnant.livejournal.com 2006-08-28 01:13 pm (UTC)(link)
What about your grandparent's middle names? If they sound good with Rowen, would you be willing to use them?
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] mrsduryee.livejournal.com 2006-08-28 02:14 pm (UTC)(link)
That name is really femenine to me, especially spelled Rowan, as ppl are suggesting. Am I crazy?

I don't think either one sounds bad, btw.

[identity profile] sayga.livejournal.com 2006-08-28 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, i think for a boy, it should be rowEn.

[identity profile] sotypical42483.livejournal.com 2006-08-28 04:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I think Rowen Stephen sounds nice. I don't really care for Rowen Harry, but it doesn't sound BAD

[identity profile] sotypical42483.livejournal.com 2006-08-28 04:02 pm (UTC)(link)
oh and yes I would use a family name that meant something to me even if it didn't flow perfectly.

[identity profile] turabiannights.livejournal.com 2006-08-28 05:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Rowan Stephen sounds fine to me, as long as the last name wouldn't end in an -en, as others have said. Rowan is indeed the correct spelling of the name. It's derived from the rowan tree. I prefer the A spelling because "Rowen" is too close to "Rowena," the feminine version... and for some reason reminds me too much of "rowin'"... :D Rowan Harry is fine, too - I think Rowan Henry would sound better, but I understand it's a family name.

Rowan is used in some frequency by American mothers on their daughters, but it is far more common as a boys name. Mr. Bean and the Archbishop of Canterbury are both named Rowan.
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] elemmennope.livejournal.com 2006-08-29 01:00 am (UTC)(link)
I think the concept of flow is totally overrated and that using a name you want to use for family reasons or just because you really love it is far more important.

I agree that if the last name ends in a -en/-an sound than Rowan Stephan is probably not the greatest, but otherwise I think both combos sound fine.