(no subject)
Jul. 28th, 2006 03:52 pmIn response to my post about the name Mitanjeli, it was written that, "If a person who is not Indian uses the name, it's cultural misappropriation, and therefore offensive. If a girl who comes from an Indian-American family wants to "Americanize" her name as a teenager, that's something all together different, and Anji or Mitzi are perfectly fine, IMO. They're both cute."
I'm going to state my opinion on the matter, and I would like to hear what the members of this community think. This is not an attempt to flame, I'm earnestly curious about other's philosophies on the matter.
I, however, completely disagree with the comment. I am free to choose the name of my children based on whatever criterion I deem appropriate. Granted, names like Allah, Buddha, Krishna, even Muhammad, Jesus and many others on that scale would absolutely be offensive if used by someone outside-- possibly even inside-- that culture. However, just because a name has root in a specific culture does not mean it is off limits to me because I'm not of that descent.
It might look odd for a white, American parent to have a son named Pedro or Julio. But does that make it "cultural missappropriation?" I certainly think not. I have absolutely no Italian blood in me whatsoever and neither does my husband, but if I want to use the name Giovanni or Alessandra that is my prerogative and anyone who finds that offensive is just looking for something to be offended about. Granted, Indian names may not be highly popularized in our Western culture, but that does not make them "off limits" to a westerner simply because they are not Indian. If this is the case, then I should never hear an Indian child named Samantha or Jessica. After all, cultural missappropration doesnt care which culture you're "misappropriating."
Anyone else, thoughts?
I'm going to state my opinion on the matter, and I would like to hear what the members of this community think. This is not an attempt to flame, I'm earnestly curious about other's philosophies on the matter.
I, however, completely disagree with the comment. I am free to choose the name of my children based on whatever criterion I deem appropriate. Granted, names like Allah, Buddha, Krishna, even Muhammad, Jesus and many others on that scale would absolutely be offensive if used by someone outside-- possibly even inside-- that culture. However, just because a name has root in a specific culture does not mean it is off limits to me because I'm not of that descent.
It might look odd for a white, American parent to have a son named Pedro or Julio. But does that make it "cultural missappropriation?" I certainly think not. I have absolutely no Italian blood in me whatsoever and neither does my husband, but if I want to use the name Giovanni or Alessandra that is my prerogative and anyone who finds that offensive is just looking for something to be offended about. Granted, Indian names may not be highly popularized in our Western culture, but that does not make them "off limits" to a westerner simply because they are not Indian. If this is the case, then I should never hear an Indian child named Samantha or Jessica. After all, cultural missappropration doesnt care which culture you're "misappropriating."
Anyone else, thoughts?
no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-29 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-29 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 09:22 pm (UTC)Basically, I agree with you wholeheartedly Ashadelic. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 10:06 pm (UTC)Sacred words and the names of gods should be off-limits if it might be disrespectful (Muhammad is like the third most popular name in the world though...so not so sure about that one...), but names from other cultures are COMPLETELY acceptable.
We may a little Emanuel, pronounced "Ay-man-u-well" running around our distinctly white home (and neighborhood and city!). Too bad. We love the name and the meaning and have utmost respect for the culture it came from.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 10:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 10:20 pm (UTC)It would be nice if they picked it for a reason, with real meaning and thought behind it. But heck, 95% of the people who pick "acceptable" white names (that's really what we're saying here right?) like Kate, Emma, or Aidan didn't get beyond "it's cute" either, so really what's the difference?
My particular heritage is Welsh, Irish, German and Finnish. But I do have some Italian, Greek, and Hawaiian names on my list. Why is Italian ok? But Indian isn't? Skin color? Hmmmm...
It's a global world, and I'm not interested in drawing hard and fast lines to keep people separate from each other.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-29 01:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 11:28 pm (UTC)I'm liking Shamu, there. Killer might be putting a few too many preconceptions on the poor child. Keiko's a nice Whelsh name but people might think she was Japanese.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-29 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 10:23 pm (UTC)I can't imagine being offended because someone from a different culture used a name exclusive to my heritage. Please. I have bigger problems in my life. LOL
no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 11:18 pm (UTC)But I do agree with you
no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 11:24 pm (UTC)The worst is when people claim a name is from a particular culture, and it's not even a name in that culture. Karma and Dharma? Not names in Indian culture. Chenoa and Cheyenne? Not Native American names. I find that to be grossly disrespectful, honestly. It's exoticizing and patronizing and sickeningly ignorant.
In short: there is nothing inherently wrong with borrowing names from other cultures, but there is a great deal that can go wrong when doing so. Just exercise caution.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 11:32 pm (UTC)Can we spot at least one flaw in this, boys and girls? I know you can.
His brother's named Kirzon, FWIW. But that time she knew what she was doing, instead of just taking her husband's word for it...
no subject
Date: 2006-07-29 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-29 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 11:35 pm (UTC)Whoever said that seems a little insecure.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-29 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-29 12:48 am (UTC)There are so many beautiful names out there people should be able to choose what they want. Altho I do agree with Krosp, be careful when you do so.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-29 05:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-29 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-29 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-29 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-29 06:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-30 12:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-30 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-30 02:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-30 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-30 02:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-30 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-30 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-30 02:24 pm (UTC)Kind of like these moron teenagers/20 somethings getting kanji tattooed on them because it's "cool". Same thing.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-30 02:17 pm (UTC)You're a drama whore? You got the answers you wanted in your last post, why do you need validation? You want a pat on the back for taking something that's possibly sacred to another culture because its OMG SO KYUTEEEEEEE?
" If this is the case, then I should never hear an Indian child named Samantha or Jessica."
I honestly doubt you would unless the child was Indian-American, which makes it a whole different situation.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-30 10:12 pm (UTC)And, I honestly doubt I would hear the name, too.. but furthermore, I dont CARE if an Indian woman living in India wants to use a traditionally American name.
If you can find any, and I mean ANY source that points to Mitanjeli as a name sacred to the people of India, I will absolutely retract everything I've said and apologize to you. I'm not looking for drama, and never have been. I have a differing opinion from yours and therefore, in your mind, shouldnt be allowed to breathe. I'm a menace to society because I love a name outside my culture! I don't love it because it's OMGZ SO KYUUUUUTE! But any reasoning behind why I love the name would be lost to you, I believe.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-31 01:14 am (UTC)And just because you don't care if someone uses an American name doesn't mean they (on a whole, as a people) don't care if you use their names. Not even because it's sacred to them, but a lot of people cultures are sick of Americans ripping them off for ANY reason.
And no I really can't fathom why you'd want to name your kid something that sounds and looks like mint jelly but hey at least they'd have a thick skin.
"I have a differing opinion from yours and therefore, in your mind, shouldnt be allowed to breathe. I'm a menace to society because I love a name outside my culture!"
Please. Martyr yourself some more. Go on.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-31 01:21 am (UTC)P.S. If you've noticed, I've said at least 4 times that I'm not planning to name any of my children Mitanjeli. I think the name is beautiful, but I have no intent to use it.=) Good thing you got all worked up over something that's really a non-issue.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-31 01:39 am (UTC)Like I said though, martyr yourself some more.
And whether or not you actually planned on using the name was irrelevant, but that went right over your head *patpat*
no subject
Date: 2006-07-31 01:39 am (UTC)