FFS.

[becomingun.livejournal.com]

Just saw this and when I stopped vomiting I knew I had to post it:

Twins....

Anngelah and Anngeloh.

Some people....

Comments

[kjerlandsen.livejournal.com]

Gross. In every way.

[b-gum.livejournal.com]

awww poop.. perfectly good names, trashed :(

[retrodancekitty.livejournal.com]

Like Angela and Angelo weren't already BAD for g/b twins.

[pleasure-past.livejournal.com]

Why?! Just why, people? Like retrodancekitty (http://community.livejournal.com/baby_names/5471784.html?thread=90258472#t90258472) said, Angela and Angelo would have been horrible twin names on their own, but why mangle the spelling like that on top of it? What could anyone think that the kids are ever possibly going to get out of that?

[solitudete.livejournal.com]

when I stopped vomiting I knew I had to post it

freakin loled

[jeweledvixen.livejournal.com]

Great names. Horrible for twins. Triply horrible spelled like this. >:(

[frost.livejournal.com]

D:

[krosp.livejournal.com]

Oh yuck!!

[kitchen-poet.livejournal.com]

whaaaaa? Is that pronounced just like it is spelled? Because I am seeing Ann-GELL-uh and Ann-GELL-oh.


Oh wait, I get it. It is suppose to equal Angela and Angelo, right? Epic spelling fail. Not to mention giving your kids the exact same name, pffft.


Kind of reminds me of playing that Mad Gab game...

[qtshorty1625.livejournal.com]

I don't know which saddens me more: the spelling or the concept.

I know someone whom, if she ever had twins, would name them Alexander and Alexandra.