Account name:
Password
(OpenID?)
(Forgot it?)
Remember Me
You're viewing
babynames
Create a Dreamwidth Account
Learn More
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
Reload page in style:
site
light
Baby Names
(no subject)
(no subject)
Oct
.
9th
,
2009
04:10 pm
winninghearts.livejournal.com
posting in
babynames
Heidi Klum finally had her baby, a girl named Lou Samuel.
And before everyone flips a lid, Samuel is the last name.
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
Date:
2009-10-09 09:13 pm (UTC)
From:
spaceandclouds.livejournal.com
I love it. Love. Lou is such a great name for a girl.
And I know everyone is probably going to comment on how it's a nickname (and it sort of is) but I actually prefer it this way. I'm not really a fan of Louise/Luella etc.
(deleted comment)
no subject
Date:
2009-10-09 10:01 pm (UTC)
From:
loanwords.livejournal.com
http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=0z&pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=heidi+klum&oq=Heidi
First hit.
no subject
Date:
2009-10-09 09:22 pm (UTC)
From:
lilacmermaid.livejournal.com
I like Lou a lot, but prefer it as a nickname - I love Louisa, especially.
no subject
Date:
2009-10-09 09:28 pm (UTC)
From:
mommaalli.livejournal.com
I've always known Lou as being a male name. My poor mother was named Tommie Lou...2 boyish names, and she never let her mother forget it. heh.
no subject
Date:
2009-10-09 09:58 pm (UTC)
From:
mommyaubrey.livejournal.com
i've always seen Lou as a boys name :\ so Lou Samuel even being the last name screams baby boy... well really old man, but w/e.
no subject
Date:
2009-10-09 10:06 pm (UTC)
From:
beepandetch.livejournal.com
I have to assume Lou is short of something. Her other daughter's name "Leni" is short for Helene.
no subject
Date:
2009-10-09 10:07 pm (UTC)
From:
beepandetch.livejournal.com
FOR something, I mean.
no subject
Date:
2009-10-09 10:54 pm (UTC)
From:
frost.livejournal.com
Lou sounds like a boys' name to me; on a girl, I think it's better when short for something.
Overall, though, it's not bad.
no subject
Date:
2009-10-10 12:23 am (UTC)
From:
lovablemess.livejournal.com
Lou is weird for a girl. I do hope it's short for something. Especially since the last name is Samuel. It's all masculine.
no subject
Date:
2009-10-10 02:00 am (UTC)
From:
rorylareina.livejournal.com
Love it. Wonder if she has a bunch of middle names also, like the brothers do.
no subject
Date:
2009-10-10 05:02 am (UTC)
From:
juniorfan29.livejournal.com
If that's the name they are going to give her whenever she's finally born...I don't like it. I dislike it on a boy and HATE it on a girl!
no subject
Date:
2009-10-10 04:17 pm (UTC)
From:
hwar.livejournal.com
I think it's cute, and I bet it's short for something. Her other children have traditional first names so I'm guessing Louisa or something similar.
12 comments
Reply
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Profile
Baby Names
SSA Baby Names Site
Recent Entries
Archive
Member Posts
Tags
Memories
Profile
February
2019
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page Summary
spaceandclouds.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
lilacmermaid.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
mommaalli.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
mommyaubrey.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
beepandetch.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
frost.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
lovablemess.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
rorylareina.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
juniorfan29.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
hwar.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
Style Credit
Style:
Fruit Salad
for
Leftovers
by
sforzinda
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 25th, 2026 07:50 pm
Powered by
Dreamwidth Studios
no subject
Date: 2009-10-09 09:13 pm (UTC)And I know everyone is probably going to comment on how it's a nickname (and it sort of is) but I actually prefer it this way. I'm not really a fan of Louise/Luella etc.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-09 10:01 pm (UTC)First hit.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-09 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-09 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-09 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-09 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-09 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-09 10:54 pm (UTC)Overall, though, it's not bad.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-10 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-10 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-10 05:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-10 04:17 pm (UTC)