http://schexyschteve.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] schexyschteve.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] babynames2009-08-29 04:08 pm

(no subject)

This girl I went to high school with just had b/g twins.

Krystal Ashley (mom)
Rusty (dad)
Jonathon Michael & Elizabeth Marie

WDYT?

I think they're kind of generic, but SO much better than most of what people around here name their kids. I do love Elizabeth.

[identity profile] sarahness.livejournal.com 2009-08-29 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Generic is a good word for them.

I like the names, though. Elizabeth is one of my favorites! I prefer Jonathan spelled that way.

[identity profile] ringsandcoffee.livejournal.com 2009-08-29 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree they're generic, but still so refreshing considering trendy alternatives. However, I am sick of Marie as a middle name (along with Ann and Lynn, which is my own MN).

Side note: BSC love!

[identity profile] laminy.livejournal.com 2009-08-29 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)
They are generic, and not only that, I don't actually like any of the names.

[identity profile] sheisgone.livejournal.com 2009-08-30 01:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Generic yes, but I love them. I would use these names.

[identity profile] corielcries.livejournal.com 2009-08-30 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't have used that spelling of the boy name, but compared to what their parents were named, they got it pretty good!

[identity profile] fleckerbug.livejournal.com 2009-09-01 12:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Pretty generic, but they got off a hell of a lot better than their parents!!

[identity profile] bluedano.livejournal.com 2009-09-01 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)
This was my thought too. With names like Krystal Ashley and Rusty, is it any wonder they wanted their kids to have "boring" generic names?