It was again really close, but one name was eliminated. I expect this round to be really close as well because these names have tied before, but we'll see. Enjoy!
And ... okay, stupid question: is this the method you've been using all along? Because these names have definitely been paired up before, and I was under the impression that you were deleting the one from each pair that received the least votes. Is that not what you've been doing? I clearly haven't been paying attention.
Yes, that's what I've been doing, but these names had a tie so neither was deleted. And I wouldn't have paired them up again, but they tied again in the three way (it was 14 to 14 to 12). And I really don't like pairing them up again.
And by close I mean Abigail had 14, Benjamin had 14, and Samuel had 12. I usually do declare a winner if they're just one apart (unless it's a three-way and there's still quite a few names left).
no subject
Date: 2009-06-25 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-25 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-25 10:15 pm (UTC)I am going to cancel your vote out, sorry:
Benjamin.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-25 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-25 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-25 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-25 11:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-25 11:26 pm (UTC)Seriously, next time, if they're close, call one a winner. 5-4 means the one with 5 wins even in the Supreme Court, and this is just baby names.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-25 11:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-25 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 12:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 12:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 01:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 01:09 am (UTC)Benjamin
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 01:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 01:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 02:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 02:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 02:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 02:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 02:38 am (UTC)I love Abigail too, though.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 02:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 03:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 03:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 04:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 05:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 05:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 05:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 07:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 08:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 12:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 12:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 02:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 02:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 04:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 07:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 08:45 pm (UTC)