[identity profile] the-good-ship.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] babynames
Saw this on the MSN UK front page.

What it's saying is pretty obvious - as naming trends change and time goes by, certain names that have become old-fashioned will fall out of use as the older generations die out - but I wanted to get your opinions on the names listed.

Boys' Names% Decline in popularity since 1907Girls' Names% Decline in popularity since 1907
Norman99.857%Gertrude100.000%
Walter99.436%Edna99.831%
Percy99.377%Ethel99.703%
Harold99.272%Irene98.174%
Ernest97.816%Ada98.120%
Herbert97.784%Norah97.787%
Clifford95.920%Olive96.989%
Frank93.640%Agnes96.825%
Arnold93.608%Elsie95.752%
Leonard92.845%Mabel95.524%
Edgar88.857%Edith95.390%
Arthur88.356%May95.387%
Albert86.419%Margaret94.418%
Edwin85.850%Minnie94.235%
Alfred83.808%Jane93.119%
Sidney79.815%Violet91.777%
Stanley74.989%Annie91.621%
Francis71.218%Lilian88.549%
Richard66.590%Mary83.829%
Fred55.606%Florence79.461%


Which do you like?
Which could you see working on a baby these days?

Date: 2008-08-14 05:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daydream11.livejournal.com
I dunno about the rest of y'all, but I totally love these names. They are right up my ally, because no one will be using them anytime soon. :D The male names not so much, because some sound awkward (Herbert, Ernest, Albert), but some I'd definitely go for. I'd probably use some of them as middle names just to play it safe, though.

Modern Day Babies with Old-Fashioned Names:

Walter
Percy (as Percival)
Harold
Arnold
Leonard
Arthur*
Sidney*
Stanley
Richard
Fred (as Frederick)

Edna*
Ethel*
Ada*
Mabel
Agnes*
Norah*
Elsie
Edith*
Jane*
Violet*
Lilian
Mary*
Florence


February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526 2728  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 25th, 2026 09:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios