(no subject)
Aug. 13th, 2008 01:28 pmWhat do you think of the name Spencer for a girl? It's one of my faves!
Also, in general, what do you think of using names for girls that are typically used for boys? I love Dylan and Shane for a girl too :)
Also, in general, what do you think of using names for girls that are typically used for boys? I love Dylan and Shane for a girl too :)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 12:41 pm (UTC)I abhor Spencer or Dylan on a girl. Shane also; but then I don't particularly like Shane on a boy, either, whereas Spencer and Dylan seem perfectly acceptable to me on males.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 12:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 01:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 01:09 pm (UTC)That said...Dylan is one of those names I actually find cute on girls.
Shane really reminds me of the L-Word, and I can't see it on any other girl!
Unfortunately, Spencer reminds me of Heidi's horrendous boyfriend in The Hills (yes, I watched that)...so I really don't like it. Plus, I don't like the way it sounds, either.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 01:15 pm (UTC)I'm not a big fan of clasically male names on females in general.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 01:41 pm (UTC)I swear these names (Dylan, Shane and Spencer) are all given to girls on various tv-series.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 02:02 pm (UTC)However, I think Dylan is the most acceptable of the three.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 02:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 03:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 03:34 pm (UTC)I hate girls names on boys, they fill me with dread.
Shane is horrible in general...
Dylan is okay, my boyfriend was just talking about how much he liked Dylan for either sex.
I'd ever ever agree to it on a girl..
no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 05:16 pm (UTC)When a name has crossed over to use on a girl, it then becomes too "weak" for use on a boy. It's — with RARE exception — a one-way naming world. Traditionally male names are intended to strengthen, and a name seen as feminine is off-limits to males as it may seem to weaken.
If you're honestly wanting to "fuck other people's narrow definition of gender", perhaps the best, most impactive way to do this would be to name a boy a girl's name — as subscribing to the age-old practice of bolstering your female with a boy's name is exactly as conformist, demeaning and traditional as history suggests.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 05:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 06:27 pm (UTC)As for boys' names on girls, I don't have a one size fits all rule, but in general I don't love it just because a lot of them sound ugly to me. Spencer especially, although I coached an adorable girl named Spencer whose parents called her Spence. I think it could work on the right child, potentially, but I wouldn't seek it out.
As someone who's taught kids, trust me: when their teacher sees their name on the roster and doesn't know if they're a boy or a girl, most kids get VERY upset. We actually had kids calling two of our swimmers "Boy Taylor" and "Girl Taylor," (because we had a male and a female both named Taylor), and I don't think either was thrilled. Confusion would be the primary reason I'd avoid these names. They don't like it, believe me.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 08:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 11:14 pm (UTC)a) the parents are teenagers
b) the parents are terribly unoriginal
c) the parents are desperate to look "cool" but they're not
d) all of the above
no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 11:22 pm (UTC)Well, of course. Nobody said otherwise (I don't think people have been "mean," either; I find this community very honest, and they usually at least have a good point).
All we are saying is that it's a fact that when a teacher or an admissions committee or an employer reads "Dylan" on a sheet of paper, they're going to think "boy," and it's your child who is going to have to deal with that, not you. It's not a horrible thing to have to correct, and for this reason I don't think anybody has said that it's absolutely unacceptable to name a girl that, but it does create problems in our society that could be avoided. No matter how much you don't like it, that's the way things are, and if there are other names you like just as well that are more recognizably feminine, they might be better choices for this reason.
I don't take offense, and of course your kids will always find a reason to hate you. I think you're kind of missing our point in saying that we're being mean; I, at least, am not, just pointing out a fact that you should consider before actually using these names. Also, I know that a bunch of people in this community are far from "traditional."
For the record, I'm only recently warming up to Dylan on boys, and it's not a favorite of mine. Same for Shane and Spencer.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-14 12:07 am (UTC)Shane I can't stand but that's because of the movie Some Kind of Wonderful.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-14 12:35 am (UTC)So, I could see any of those names working for girls, except for Shane, really. I always have associated that with a boy.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-14 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-14 12:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-14 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-14 06:21 am (UTC)I also like: Blake, Blair, and Brett for girls.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-14 06:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-14 07:27 am (UTC)I don't get how having names defined as male names and names defined as female names contributes to a narrow definition of gender. Gender exists. Names are used to quickly identify people. If you see 'Jennifer', you think 'female'. You probably also think, 'western or American'. Likewise, if you see a boy named Muhammad, you probably think, 'Muslim male'. I wouldn't advocate giving a white Christian kid from Iowa the name 'Muhammad', for basically the same reason I wouldn't advocate giving a girl a boy's name. It gives people false assumptions, and creates a huge amount of confusion for the kid to have to deal with. If you want to fuck with gender stereotypes, change your name to a male name, but let the kid decide for themselves.
If you had a son, and the name Jessica 'felt right', would you name him Jessica? It just seems to me that a lot of people who complain about narrow definitions of gender would never even contemplate using a girl's name on a boy.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-14 08:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-16 05:31 am (UTC)I don't have a problem with boy's names on girls, but I can see other peoples' points against it. But Spencer is definitely one of my favourites, mostly because I am head over heels in love with Spencer Carlin. Haha.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-16 11:22 am (UTC)