The Nicholas Debate
Jan. 3rd, 2006 11:45 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
My husband and I are having a little boy in February. We thought we had chosen the perfect name for him. We chose the name Daniel Galway, which holds a significance to us: Daniel is my husband's name, and we decided that our first child's name would honor him long ago, and Galway is from a song that my husband sings to me. The name holds a significance for both of us, obviously. Now, our dilemma lies in the addition of a third name. My uncle's name was Nicholas, and he recently passed away. We've given into my parents' convincing and are looking to add the name Nicholas to our son's name. My family doesn't want the baby to have two middle names and neither does my husband.
Do we:
1. Get rid of "Galway" and have him be Daniel Nicholas.
2. Name him Nicholas Galway and save Daniel for another child.
3. Name him Galway Nicholas
4. Find another name altogether.
Any thoughts? Suggestions? (Hopefully I make sense!)
Do we:
1. Get rid of "Galway" and have him be Daniel Nicholas.
2. Name him Nicholas Galway and save Daniel for another child.
3. Name him Galway Nicholas
4. Find another name altogether.
Any thoughts? Suggestions? (Hopefully I make sense!)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 11:05 pm (UTC)i really like the name Daniel Nicholas although I think Nicholas Daniel flows a little better....
good luck
no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 11:39 pm (UTC)I'd go with your choice of Daniel Galway. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 11:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 11:51 pm (UTC)I'd go with Nicholas Daniel, myself. Galway is nice, but I might save it for the next one. That's just what I would do, though.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 01:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 03:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 03:49 am (UTC)I'd go with Nicholas Daniel, myself. Galway is nice, but I might save it for the next one. That's just what I would do, though.
Ditto
Sorry for you loss.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 05:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 08:16 am (UTC)Galway might be nice for a kitten or something? But I don't much like it at all for a child. IMO, just because something holds significance, doesn't mean it automatically makes a good name.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-04 08:49 am (UTC)Unless you're doing something completely different, you are already honoring your husband by giving the baby his last name. I never saw the point in honoring the father of the baby, because every child you will have will carry his last name. (I know there are some cases where the children do not have their father's last name, but 99% do.)
I like Galway Nicholas.
Good luck what ever you decide.
One other thing. It's not your family's business whether you give a child two middle names. It is your husband's business, so if he says no, so be it. However, if your family doesn't like it (or any other method of naming a baby) too bad. It is your baby, and your turn to do what ever you would like to do.
Too many people involve their family, when it should be a special and private thing between you and your spouse. Once your baby is born, your family will not complain that it has two middle names, or that you named it "X."
no subject
Date: 2006-01-05 06:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-07 05:28 pm (UTC)