more help for naming baby...
Jan. 14th, 2008 09:24 pmSo...we're having trouble deciding on a name for our little girl. We've narrowed it down a little...my husband likes Harper a little better and I like Abigail (Abbie) a little better. However, today I thought we could name her Ruby, after my grandma (who died the week she was conceived). In any case the middle name will be Elizabeth, which is also a family name. My son's name is Jackson Elliot and we call him Jack. So a couple of questions:
Is this weird or morbid? I know it's fairly common to use family names, but my grandma *just* died in August. Is the name appropriate for a teenager or young woman? I can certainly see a little girl being called Ruby, and also an older woman. Does it fit well with Jack as a sibset?
[Poll #1121384]
Is this weird or morbid? I know it's fairly common to use family names, but my grandma *just* died in August. Is the name appropriate for a teenager or young woman? I can certainly see a little girl being called Ruby, and also an older woman. Does it fit well with Jack as a sibset?
[Poll #1121384]
no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 02:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 02:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 02:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 03:07 am (UTC)All three names are great, but Abigail is very very very popular, so I'd go with either Harper or Ruby. Of the two, I like Ruby better.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 03:30 am (UTC)But I do still like Harper slightly more. =/
no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 03:36 am (UTC)It's ranked 2 in England & Jack is ranked 1 so yes, there must be a fair few Ruby & Jack sibsets out there.
It's not exessively popular in the US though- 138, whilst Abigail is 6 (not counting it's 4 other variants in the top 1000)
Harper is androdgenous & rather a trendy literary name.
I'd go for Ruby Elizabeth definitely.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 03:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 09:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 01:59 pm (UTC)It sounds great for all ages. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 05:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-16 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-17 06:54 pm (UTC)