(no subject)
Nov. 26th, 2005 01:15 pmwell, our next baby apt is December 10th...dr thinks it's a girl, but wants to be certain...so we're looking at naming the baby after my grandmother & sister. -I really don't want to know how my kids gonna hate me, it's a bad name, whatnot and all that, I'm just happy to have this baby and it's going to be named after my gma if indeed it is a girl.-
If it turns out that the baby is indeed a girl it will be Laiyhleine Anaya, after my gma & my sister, if however it is a boy, I need help finding a name that goes with Bryan. I don't want Bryan Daniel as that's his daddy's name and he doesn't want it the same either, I would like to keep the D initial-but daddy doesn't care, so if anyone can come up with some suggestions...for a middle name that goes with Bryan. We've had D suggestions before, if anyone has any other letter suggestions.Our last name is Farr, so..any help would be appreciated.
If it turns out that the baby is indeed a girl it will be Laiyhleine Anaya, after my gma & my sister, if however it is a boy, I need help finding a name that goes with Bryan. I don't want Bryan Daniel as that's his daddy's name and he doesn't want it the same either, I would like to keep the D initial-but daddy doesn't care, so if anyone can come up with some suggestions...for a middle name that goes with Bryan. We've had D suggestions before, if anyone has any other letter suggestions.Our last name is Farr, so..any help would be appreciated.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 10:36 am (UTC)Bryan David Farr
Byran Dominic Farr
Bryan Donald Farr
no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 10:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 01:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 11:19 am (UTC)it just looks like a big bunch of letters thrown together and that child is going to have to correct every single person who tries to read it and say it
..sorry but it's the truth
no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 11:40 am (UTC)Bryan Daniel
no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 04:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-27 08:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 06:20 pm (UTC)Yeah, sorry, but when you post a name as bad as that, people are not going to be able to hold back from giving their opinions.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 08:00 pm (UTC)Hyphens are making a comeback in a big way.
Or maybe you'll be the first.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 10:58 pm (UTC)Also a lot easier to figure out whose mail was whose... TDW was my dad, TCK was my youngest brother :P
no subject
Date: 2005-11-27 09:01 am (UTC)I don't get it. Using your example, sure you can tell TDW and TCK apart, but wouldn't it be easier to tell Thomas (or whatever the T is for) and Steve apart? Like on phone calls, "Is Thomas there?" "Which one?" Blah.
The purpose of a name is to identify a specific person. If you can't keep people straight despites their names, the name is failing its primary purpose.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-27 01:11 pm (UTC)But yeah, sure having different first names would make things even easier, but if you have to have a child named after your first name, then (IMO) the confusion is less with different middle names/initials.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-26 10:59 pm (UTC)It's what we named our son ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-27 08:55 am (UTC)Doesn't sound like she's going that route though.
A traditional name?
Date: 2005-11-27 09:37 am (UTC)So if you want to spell a name Alisoun, go ahead - it has historical precedent: Chaucer did it in his *Miller's Tale*. Or use Alyson if you prefer. Back then, "Any spelling that would reproduce the sound [would have been] 'correct'"
But there's the rub: even the barely literate of the Dark Ages, when forced to transcribe a name, would have used spellings that *phonetically represented the sounds* they wanted to convey.
Sorry, but spelling you suggest here is one that not even a medieval churl would consider.
Re: A traditional name?
Date: 2005-11-27 09:39 am (UTC)You win.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-27 08:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-28 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 11:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 11:42 am (UTC)