I'm almost certain there was a post on this name recently, but I couldn't find it, so I made another.
a) Do you guys prefer Lily or Lilly?
b) Is it too popular to ever consider? (I won't be having kids for over ten years, hopefully, so what I am asking is, will it be dated?)
c) What do you think of it in general?
Thanks!
a) Do you guys prefer Lily or Lilly?
b) Is it too popular to ever consider? (I won't be having kids for over ten years, hopefully, so what I am asking is, will it be dated?)
c) What do you think of it in general?
Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 07:47 pm (UTC)B) Hmm not really, depends where you are and what you'd consider too high/popular. It's not so hot as to seem fadish though. So shouldn't be dated really (top names from '97 are still fairly well used now). I can picture it for any age, so that's good.
C) I really love it, on it's own merits and that it honours my mother (her first name means lily). It's too popular for me as a fn [top 20 in the UK], so I plan to use Liliana as a mn.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 08:09 pm (UTC)I don't think it will be dated in 10 years, because it's simple and not creative, but I'm really not good at foretelling trends, so ;)
And I think it's a beautiful name, just not really my style. I'm more into unusual names =)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 08:39 pm (UTC)It's fairly popular, but I don't think it's too bad. I'd consider using it, regardless. Many of the top names right now have been on my list of favorites for years, so that doesn't faze me.
It's one of my favorites, period. It's classic, simple, beautiful, and has pleasant connotations.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 09:17 pm (UTC)My point was that ten years ago, it was a name used on tv and tv names are often "popular" ones at the time, yet it hasn't gone anywhere. I didn't think to go as far back as the Munsters, Lily Lambert was just the first tv Lily that popped into my head :o)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 05:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 09:16 pm (UTC)2. Probably.
3. I really like it. It's very light and pleasant to me without being boring. It makes me think of Monet.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 09:46 pm (UTC)2. Like Jessica, Ashley, and whatever name from the 80's that were popular, I think it will loose it's popularity sometime.
3. I think the name is adorable! It's on my favorite name list, but I don't think I'll use it.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 10:08 pm (UTC)b) I don't think so
c) I LOVE it. I'd use it.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 11:09 pm (UTC)2) I really don't think it's *that* popular, and I think popularity matters less than overall quality of the name.
3) I like it a lot on a little kid, but it seems way too cutesy for an adult. I like it as a nickname for Elizabeth (which is actually pretty common), because then she can be Lily, but she can also be Liz or Beth or Elizabeth or Libby or 57585959 other nicknames.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 11:10 pm (UTC)I prefer Lily versus Lilly because my cousin's name is Lilly. I won't be having kids for a long time, either, and I plan on insisting that my first daughter is Lily Alice after my great-grandmother (Lilian Alice).
no subject
Date: 2007-11-05 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 11:31 pm (UTC)a) Lily sounds more formal, Lilly more nickname-ish
b) it's common now, there's no predicting it in 10 years from now, I guess
c) I don't know why, but it feels totally like a nickname, even Lily. Maybe because it's the same syllable twice
no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 01:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 06:47 am (UTC)I'm tired of Lily now; being a fellow Aussie
no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 01:23 am (UTC)I don't really understand it's popularity.
I suppose it is sort of pretty, but I find it plain and kind of boring.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 07:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 03:43 pm (UTC)