9 Children!
Nov. 3rd, 2007 11:14 amI had a quick scan of the community and didn't see this already posted, last night on the news there was a story about this couple who had nine children [all through sperm donor]
While 9 kids is weird enough, they have had TWO sets of quads.
Here is the article:
http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Double-quads-Mum-conceives-10th-baby/2007/02/12/1171128844944.html
And here are the names!
Parents - Dale and Darren.
Shelby [oldest girl]
Quad set 1:
Emma
Ellie
Samuel
Joseph
Quad set 2:
Sarah
Alice
Matthew
Milly [Milly was unfortunately stillborn.]
Tiger Lilly [youngest]
AND they are apparently expecting number 10.
Woah!
While 9 kids is weird enough, they have had TWO sets of quads.
Here is the article:
http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Double-quads-Mum-conceives-10th-baby/2007/02/12/1171128844944.html
And here are the names!
Parents - Dale and Darren.
Shelby [oldest girl]
Quad set 1:
Emma
Ellie
Samuel
Joseph
Quad set 2:
Sarah
Alice
Matthew
Milly [Milly was unfortunately stillborn.]
Tiger Lilly [youngest]
AND they are apparently expecting number 10.
Woah!
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 12:40 am (UTC)Plus, wasn't Tiger Lily a character in Peter Pan?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 12:44 am (UTC)the rest are all ok though
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 12:58 am (UTC)I wonder if this next one is a boy, if they'll name him Peter Pan?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 01:30 am (UTC)I don't like the use of first letters.. two E's, an S and a J.
Ellie should be Eleanor/Eliana etc as the others are full names.
Aart from the random Tiger Lilly they are all boring names.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 01:42 am (UTC)In the forests of the night
...sorry, I was an English major
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 02:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 10:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 05:34 pm (UTC)Ellie and Milly and Lilly are a bit too cutesy for me, but overall the names are nice.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-03 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 01:32 am (UTC)However, she is only 2 months old, so perhaps that article was written BEFORE Tiger Lilly was born? I didn't check the date.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 01:57 am (UTC)