I'm not a fan of using children names as a poster board for advertising what hobbies or heroes the parents are into. Example: Lennon, Lennox, Hendrix, Vonnegut, Cash, etc.
It bugs me especially when the excuse parents give is "I'm a huge fan of [insert name]" or "They changed my life!" If they impacted you so much then change YOUR name. If you name your child some famous last name you'll probably just increase the odds of your child hating that famous person since that's what people would first think of and ask questions about. Imagine having to explain all the time why your parents named you Insert Famous Name, and other related questions.*
I know there are always exceptions. I'm sure there are/will be children who love their famous names, or that there are parents who didn't name their child some famous name for fandom's sake. It's when they do use their kid to advertise the parent's favorite musician, author, etc that I roll my eyes and think "Oh well."
Anyone agree?
*I left this as a comment to someone's post but thought to share it since it is a strong opinion I have on names
It bugs me especially when the excuse parents give is "I'm a huge fan of [insert name]" or "They changed my life!" If they impacted you so much then change YOUR name. If you name your child some famous last name you'll probably just increase the odds of your child hating that famous person since that's what people would first think of and ask questions about. Imagine having to explain all the time why your parents named you Insert Famous Name, and other related questions.*
I know there are always exceptions. I'm sure there are/will be children who love their famous names, or that there are parents who didn't name their child some famous name for fandom's sake. It's when they do use their kid to advertise the parent's favorite musician, author, etc that I roll my eyes and think "Oh well."
Anyone agree?
*I left this as a comment to someone's post but thought to share it since it is a strong opinion I have on names
no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 07:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 10:03 pm (UTC)To each her own though...
no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 10:07 pm (UTC)I like the way Seattle sounds. I would never name my kid Chicago or San Diego or anything...
no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 08:07 pm (UTC)Or even just vacations.
"Hey, Seattle, come in for dinner." Haha I just can't imagine it.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 03:11 am (UTC)I did know a girl named Montana. She lived here (greater-Seattle metropolitan area), but I thought it was hilarious when her family traveled through Montana.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 03:10 pm (UTC)As a former Eugenian (for school), I must say, I AGREE. LOL.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 07:29 pm (UTC)i went to middle school with a guy named Paris. the only thing he hated was that he always got: "oh! like the city!" (well, now he prolly gets: "oh, like hilton's ex fiancee!")
when in actuality it was : "oh! like the guy who stole queen helen and began the trojan war!" b/c his dad was a big mythology buff.
ANYwyas, he didn't mind his name. maybe now he does. lol.
if the kids hate their name that much, then they should go by the middle name until they're old enough to change it. i say if it ain't your kid, then why worry if they're named after an idol of the parents?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 07:44 pm (UTC)Or, "oh like Hilton?" LOL.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 09:44 pm (UTC)i tell my boyfriend he needs to be more colin firth-y/mr. darcy-y.
;)
and secretly, he does that little "i want to smile but i can't show how much i want to" smirk that colin does in that movie... it's kinda why i fell for my guy. lol
no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 02:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 07:56 pm (UTC)If it's just the first name and it's being used as a middle name, I don't agree that it's weird, nor do I agree that the kid is going to hate having a famous name. However, if you name your kid "Johnny Cash McCarthy" or "John Lennon Walker" or something like that, you're just asking for trouble. But if it's a name where people don't automatically know that it's after a famous person, I don't think it's a big deal.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 08:13 pm (UTC)The strength of the connection makes a difference, to me at least. Most Eleanors aren't named after E. Roosevelt (I wasn't), but pretty much anyone named Lennon has parents who were Beatles fans. Me naming my son James/Jimmy in honor of Jimmy Hendrix isn't as blatant as naming him Hendrix.
So your commitment to using your names just as middles is fine, but to my mind unnecessary. No one would freak out at kids with first names Eleanor and Atticus (I don't think).
no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 08:08 pm (UTC)I have a friend named McCartney and he's actually an AMAZING musician, but he's been called Carty all his life, so I don't think it bothers him so much. And, I mean, I don't think there's any explanation necessary. When someone hears the name, it registers that he's named after the musician and that's the end of it.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 08:52 pm (UTC)Every name has connotations, which people will mention at some point, particularly if the name is/becomes part of popular culture. That and names are always a reflection of the namer, even if it's not always so blatant.
My middle name it was chosen in honour of someone* who was significant to my parents. In the abstract I probably wouldn't be that crazy about the name, but I've grown to love because of what it means to my parents.
I love the name Lennon in it's own right [well yes John was cool, but I'm just being fangirly], and have done for years. So would happily use it for my son, and hopefully he'll appreciate the name too. He might not like it, but I don't like my given name and that has no meaning behind it.
Whatever you choose naming a child is a leap of faith. So you might as well just do what seems right for your family. And then there's always deed poll.
*a cousin of mine, rather than a celebrity. Actually I'd appreciate it if there was a famous Clair, maybe then people would be more likely to spell it right.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 09:49 pm (UTC)any name is a given name regardless of the inspiration.
becky*
no subject
Date: 2007-07-12 10:06 pm (UTC)That being said, I think it's dumb when people hear a name (ex. Monet) and think, "Hey, that sounds cool, I'm going to give it my child!" but know nothing about the person they're naming the kid after.
And sure, some kids will hate being named after a famous person, but some kids will hate being named John or Elizabeth, it's a risk every parent takes
no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 12:33 am (UTC)That aside, regardless I find it tacky to give a kid an uncommon and famous name like Vonnegut.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 01:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 03:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 03:27 am (UTC)Even if others don't know these actors or actresses, I still don't care for people naming their children AFTER them. If they liked the name then that's something else.
"Also, many people treat their children like extensions of family members they were named after, so it is not completely different from what the OP was talking about."
I personally don't care for naming kids after family members or "honoring" deceased people by naming your children after them. When naming after family member or friends I think excessive baggage is added to that child's name. But I wasn't talking about that specifically here. I was just talking about famous people that parents are fans of.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 03:28 am (UTC)Earlier I posted saying that there's a big difference between naming a kid (the examples used earlier) Eleanor versus Hendrix. Same goes for Clark, which is a fine name on its own and also happens to belong to an actor the parents may or may not really like (whether or not he's actually the namesake isn't super relevant, because the name stands fine on its own).
Hendrix or Lennon or Monet are names whose primary cultural associations are with famous people, and as such carry much stronger connotations about the parents doing the naming.
And of course a kid could dislike the relative after whom he or she is named. But if it's not a stupid name, who cares? If I named my kid John and he hates Uncle John, well whatever. If I name my kid Cobain and he passionately hates grunge and Nirvana, well, that's pretty much all he's got, as far as that name goes.
It's a personal opinion of course, and people who feel differently than I do can certainly feel free to name however they choose. It doesn't really affect either of us, until I get kids with stupid names in my classes and laugh with my friends about it later. Ha.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 03:44 am (UTC)Jimi Hendrix and John Lennon are (late) musicians the vast majority of Americans (and perhaps the world) know a lot about. You probably can't win very many games involving pop culture without knowing who they are. Haha.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 03:57 am (UTC)I usually don't share much on how I think people should go about naming people but I'm unemployed so it happened.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 06:32 am (UTC)Each to their own, of course. (:
no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 06:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 06:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 06:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 07:17 am (UTC)My name is Savannah and I always get "oh, like the city?" It was irritating the first couple years and then I just got over it. Yeah, like the city. My biggest problem is the fact that my middle name is Anna. Now that sucks. But I'm not angry with my parents nor do I suddenly hate the city just because we share a name and it has been pointed out to me.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 07:50 am (UTC)It's not a pretty normal like Audrey that bugs me but rather if you were to name you kid Hepburn so that it was extra explicit you were thinking of Audrey or Katherine Hepburn.
As for Lennon, that's just my pet peeve, hence the post.
I had also stated that there will always be exceptions so I'm glad you like your name. Though that's a city name and I have different feelings towards those than the ones I stated here.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 09:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 12:01 pm (UTC)I told my FSIL that we think we're going to name a dog after my husband instead of passing it on to a son (and making him a IV). She was all like. "Oh yay, does that mean I can use it?" Sure, but we're still naming our dog that.
Oaky, not the same thing.. but yeah.
I had to laugh at Lennox.. like the fine china and crystal Lennox?
The last name as first-name thing is weird. Using the first name wouldn't seem so odd. I wasn't named after anyone famous, but I do like having been named after someone.. makes me feel like I have a tie with the past.
feel like commenting again
Date: 2007-07-13 12:18 pm (UTC)My landlord's father wanted him to have a really prestigious name, so he named him Sherman Ulysses Someothergenral Lastname. Not the best legacy..
no subject
Date: 2007-07-13 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-14 02:52 am (UTC)