[identity profile] sian-y.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] babynames
What do you guys think of the name Bronte for a girl?
I like it but i'm not sure I'd actually use it.

Date: 2010-03-28 05:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] becomingun.livejournal.com
I adore it. Absolutely love it. I'd seriously consider using it.

Date: 2010-03-28 05:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-tergo-lupi.livejournal.com
Maybe as a middle, but why not use one of the sisters' actual names?

Date: 2010-03-28 05:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarahness.livejournal.com
I don't like it at all.

Date: 2010-03-28 05:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ohhvelocitygirl.livejournal.com
I've always loved it, but as brontë

Date: 2010-03-28 06:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolff.livejournal.com
I love it!

Date: 2010-03-28 06:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arbus.livejournal.com
i don't like it. wouldn't use it.

doesn't get more pretentious sounding, imo.

Date: 2010-03-28 06:13 pm (UTC)

Date: 2010-03-28 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] schexyschteve.livejournal.com
I've never read a book by any of them, and it sounds slightly pretentious.

Date: 2010-03-28 06:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hwar.livejournal.com
That's how I feel about it too. It's a little trying-too-hard-to-be-literary for me (and I am very literary). But I named my daughter Jane, not Austen. ;)

Date: 2010-03-28 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] matika88.livejournal.com
Middle name perhaps.

Date: 2010-03-28 07:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] depeche810.livejournal.com
don't like it....I think of Bronte-saurus, like the dinosaur.

Date: 2010-03-28 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aquilinum.livejournal.com
Horrible sound with nice association. Just... horrible, horrible sound.

Date: 2010-03-28 09:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-tergo-lupi.livejournal.com
Yeah. I mean. I'm considering Curie as a middle name (for a girl), but NEVER as a first name.

Date: 2010-03-28 09:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frost.livejournal.com
I don't like it in general.

Date: 2010-03-29 12:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] corielcries.livejournal.com
I like it. Considered using it as a middle, still might!

Date: 2010-03-29 12:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spaceandclouds.livejournal.com
I agree! Granted, Anne, Emily and Charlotte are all pretty plain and do not give off the immediate "literary!" signal, but they're nicer than Bronte, which sounds a little harsh, I think.

If you're going purely for the sound, then sure...although it still seems a little pretentious to me.

Date: 2010-03-29 12:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-tergo-lupi.livejournal.com
Bronte just sounds like Brontosaurus, and you don't want a baby to be scientifically innaccurate!

Date: 2010-03-29 03:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sweetest-asylum.livejournal.com
like charlotte bronte?

Date: 2010-03-29 06:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cremepuff.livejournal.com
Hahaha! This comment = WIN.

Date: 2010-03-29 06:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cremepuff.livejournal.com
Eww. Pretentious, doesn't sound very feminine at all. Sorry.

Date: 2010-03-30 01:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] how-obscure.livejournal.com
I have mixed feelings about it. I kind of like it in theory whenever I hear someone mention it, but I don't know about in practice, and I can see where some people think it sounds pretentious.
Page generated Jan. 25th, 2026 06:32 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios