DAMN!
I started a hot topic with the Danish baby name list. I have to say Denmark is not the only country with such a rule and Denmark is a liberal country so it does seem a bit weird--but that's how it is. I found this website where people have put their views and it might describe it a bit better:
http://thebabynamewizard.ivillage.com/parenting/archives/2004/11/my_baby_my_name_choice_or_not.html
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 06:12 pm (UTC)Otherwise it's ultimatly quite reasonable to have some guidelines, because [potential] parents often seem to have an 'all about me' attitude toward naming and not think very far ahead. Often read birth announcements and wish somebody had stepped in. Just standardising spellings would be a start.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 06:36 pm (UTC)The first problem I have with name laws is that no one has the same idea of "acceptable". I mentioned this in the other thread, that to me there's nothing wrong with Ryder or Seven, names someone else had indicated should be restricted. I wouldn't use either but I don't think they're problematic.
*lone ducks some more* My second problem is more related to that quote. I hate the binary gender system, and I don't think people should name based on restrictions that are a product of binary gender. I think restricting names by gender not only reinforces an artificial concept, it could also negatively impact babies who are born without a clear gender. Whether you choose a girly name, a unisex name, or a boys name for your daughter, there's still no guarantee the name will fit her. Names should be evaluated on individual aesthetics, not on ideas of gender.
The only rule I can think of right now that I believe should exist in naming, is not to name children after diseases (intentionally or not).
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 06:40 pm (UTC)(So was Dublin even when I lived in Ireland). They have expanded the list for more ethnic names.
Europe has seen a wave of immigration recently.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 11:02 pm (UTC)