[identity profile] velkoria.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] babynames
I've noticed it seems to be a trend here to really dislike popular names and it's not the typical 'well, I like it but since it's so popular I would avoid using it at this time' but, with the exception of made up/misspelled names I just don't get it when people go 'Madison/Sarah/Emma sucks! It's in the top 10 HELLO! I'd pick any name but that' or something along those lines but more sugar coated or something. So what say you, do you honestly rule out a name on the hate list because it's popular or simply sigh and hope by the time you have a child the trend dies down?

I for example will admit I love Aidan as a name, the meaning is really sweet and I just like it. Not to mention that spelling it Aidán it is perfectly easy for my hispanic family to pronounce. And whenever I mention my like of the name it's like OMG EW -AYDEN TREND FOLLOWER!! When really... it's a name that's been around for centuries!

Another name I really like is Madison... this one I wouldn't use so much and it's not as high up as Aidan but it's nice enough but OMG EW MAD- TREND FOLLOWER gets so tiring to hear...
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Date: 2009-12-28 02:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] magicpointeshoe.livejournal.com
Too many people named that name makes it completely unappealing to me. Even if I waited a few years that is still a butt load of people in the same generation with that name. No thanks.

Date: 2009-12-28 02:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cairtirnin.livejournal.com
I love a lot of popular names, but I won't use them if they are super popular. I really wanted to name a baby Madeleine, but I won't because I grew up one of 1232342342 Amandas and always hated it.

Date: 2009-12-28 02:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stormqueen280.livejournal.com
There are names that I like a lot and are very popular, and I would still use them. According to the SSA website, the names Michael, Daniel, Anthony and Christopher are among the top 10, and I'd use them in a heartbeat. Sophia is among my top 5, and I've always loved Chloe.

For me, it's more a matter of how much I like the name. All those names are overused, but if I like them enough, I won't give much importance to popularity.

Date: 2009-12-28 02:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blueberryeyes17.livejournal.com
My mom has an unusual name, and I have an unusual name, so I've always wanted to carry on the trend with my children. Not SUPER weird names, but unique enough that I rarely meet others with my name. If I like a name and find out it's in the top 10 or so that would be enough to seriously reconsider it.

Date: 2009-12-28 02:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lind-saay.livejournal.com
I like some of the names in the top 10. I'm kind of a hypocrite about it. I would never use the names Emma or Ava 00 even though they are nice enough names and I don't dislike them -- simply because they are in the top 10. Emily, on the other hand, I would absolutely use.

I guess I look at it like this: if I can picture the name on someone over the age of 12 without it sounding weird, and if it's a name that has a REASON for being so popular, I'm okay with it. Emily, for example, is a really classic name that has been popular FOREVER, whereas a name like Nevaeh is horrendous and simply popular because people think it makes their kid unique. Plus, if it's a name I love, I'd use it no matter how popular it is. My name is Lindsay and I was one of 7 in my high school graduating class of 100 and I have had no lasting emotional damages, so I don't think it'll kill my kids, either.

Some names I would use regardless of their popularity: Eliza, Jude, Harriet, Louisa, Norah, Lily, Anne, Samuel, Michael, Paul, Jasper, Thatcher, Asher, Silas, Elijah, Elias.

Date: 2009-12-28 02:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quitmyscene.livejournal.com
Popularity means close to nothing to me. I might consider it if I'm between two names anyway, and one of them keeps popping up on birth announcements while I'm pregnant/those kids will be in the same grade as future child.

I love Aidan, but am dating a Dan... and see, the pun is right there. Dating "a Dan" .. "Aidan" ... close enough. Looking at the top 50 for 2008, I like..
Jacob*, Ethan, Alexander*, Aidan, Elijah, Dylan, Evan, Jack, Aaron
Madison, Ava, Natalie, Alyssa, Riley, Sydney

* = though, I'd only use those as middle names

As for Riley.. I actually probably wouldn't use that, due to popularity in people I'm close with. The most meaningful one being Dan's nephew. But I know three other little girl Rileys. I also wouldn't use Austin because two of my friends have Austins. I'm pretty sure every name on my list is rising in popularity, which I'm okay with. If anything, it just shows my boyfriend that they're "real" usable names!

Date: 2009-12-28 02:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] waitingonsunday.livejournal.com
I don't care about popularity. My favorite name for girls is Emily! Actually, I like every name in the SSA's top ten right now, except Chloe, Christopher, and Matthew.

Date: 2009-12-28 02:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] let-letitbe.livejournal.com
I like a lot of names in the top 100, especially Michael, Benjamin, Dominic, Charlotte, Abigail, and Alexandra. While it does make me think harder about if I like every aspect of the name (spelling, pronunciation, and meaning), it will not deter me from using that as my child's name.

Honestly, I don't get the big deal about being one of several people with the same name in your class. Chances are, bar some crazy unique spelling, several other people in the world share your name. Get over it, we're not as unique as we're led to believe. My name (Hunter) is very uncommon for a girl, but I am by no means the only female Hunter on this earth and I am happy with that.

Date: 2009-12-28 02:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frost.livejournal.com
I rule the name out for my child if it's really popular, but that doesn't mean I dislike the name. I just don't want my child to share his/her name with four/five other kids in their class. As a kid, I always felt sorry for for classmates that needed to have their surname's first initial tacked on, just so people could identify them. :(

-Mildly- popular I might be able to deal with, since most of my top boy's names are in the top sixty (right now, the name I want is Sebastian)...

Date: 2009-12-28 02:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daydream11.livejournal.com
Disclaimer: In this comment I define popularity as generational trends, not classics that have been around forever.

I have an issue with popularity, I have no shame in admitting, at least when it comes to girls. I have an unusual name and I love the fact that I can go around on a first name basis. I've never been "Samaria H." or "Samaria M." or "Samaria with the black hair" and I thank my parents profusely for that bit. There's something to be said for being The Only One; even if it's only on a roster, I always stand out. It certainly isn't for everyone, but I for one appreciate the fact that I'm one of a kind (without my name being Unique) without even trying, and I'll pass that on to my kids. Being one of the gray masses has never appealed to me.

That said, I like my unusual names within reason. The names I like have to have a solid history behind them, sound appropriate in a professional context, and be spelled correctly. I will always prefer Madison over Alyzabeth any day of the week, even though verbally the latter definitely trumps the former. (Though in a contest between Nevaeh and Alyzabeth, I just won't have any kids.)

If the names Ariadne, Persephone, and Andromeda become popular in ten years, I will be upset. However, I will also still use the name. I've loved them forever, so why not? There are names I will like regardless of popularity and will seriously consider using, names like Helena, Athena, and Camilla.

I don't care about popularity for boys, actually. Jude, Henry, Gabriel, Simon, George, John, and Arthur will always be on my list regardless of where they stand on the charts.

Date: 2009-12-28 03:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holidaylights.livejournal.com
Your last comment is sort of interesting to me, because I've noticed that many people seem to favor more unusual girl's names, and more classic boy's names. Out of curiosity, do you know why that's true for you?

Date: 2009-12-28 03:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thejoysofjess.livejournal.com
I honestly doesn't bother me a bit, and I say this as a Jessica of the 80s.

For boys I really like Alexander and Christopher, both top 10. I won't end up using either though, because we have family members with those names already.

For girls, I like Emma and Olivia in the top 10, but won't end up using either again. My husband hates both of them. :( Olivia is a really,really pretty name though. I'm glad it's popular.

Date: 2009-12-28 03:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-tergo-lupi.livejournal.com
This. I'm specifically avoiding names that are too popular. That doesn't mean I dislike them, but that I won't use them. But, yes, if I hear a name too many times, it can wear out its welcome for me.

Date: 2009-12-28 03:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-tergo-lupi.livejournal.com
There's a difference between knowing you aren't the only one and having the same name as 12 other people in your class.

Date: 2009-12-28 03:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daydream11.livejournal.com
I'm not sure if my reason is logical, but it's a matter of taste. I prefer my men solid, steady, a bit dark, traditional without being chauvinistic. When I'm watching movies and television I notice that I usually crush on the old-fashioned types, especially in period dramas. I also like older men in general, or at least men who are more mature and intelligent than I am without being unapproachable. The Remus Lupins crossed with Regulus Black with a dash of Cedric Diggory for some smiles once in a while??? XP

And I think all of that is reflected in the names I prefer for boys; they never go out of style, carry about them an air of aristocracy, and are - for lack of a better word - cuddly.

At the same time, I don't care for predictable women. My girlfriends aren't wild, per se, but they are their own people. Ariel is not Amina is not Jen, you know? I guess I like that to be reflected in actual names. On a deeper, primal level, women have always tried to distinguish themselves in a decidedly different way than men have. Men don't care about names the way women do. I'm speculating here, but for centuries women have been known by their father's and/or their husband's name, and traditionally the only thing that is truly ours is our first name. How that exactly trickles down to me and other female baby name lovers preferring the unusual over the ordinary - or, at least, what is perceived to be unusual - I have no idea, but I think that certainly plays a factor.

TL;DR. TBQH, I really don't know.

Date: 2009-12-28 03:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holidaylights.livejournal.com
Hmm, that's a really interesting way of thinking about it. Thanks for taking the time to respond!

Date: 2009-12-28 03:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] let-letitbe.livejournal.com
Having the same name as people in your class can be frustrating and confusing, but it's not like it is emotionally scarring. A name can mean a lot, but when it comes down to it, it doesn't define who you are. I just don't think a person should forgo using a name s/he likes just because it's popular.

Date: 2009-12-28 03:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-tergo-lupi.livejournal.com
Some people have different priorities.

Date: 2009-12-28 03:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] let-letitbe.livejournal.com
I know that, I'm just stating my opinion.

Date: 2009-12-28 03:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] duckduckcaboose.livejournal.com
To me, there's a big difference between trendy and popular. I don't mind popular names, the ones that have been high-ranking forever, but I don't like the trendy names.

In middle school, I loved the name Aidan, which was ranked about 100 when I first came across it. Now it is so over-used and bastardized that it has completely lost its appeal.

However, names like Michael (top 10 since 1943 and always in the top 100 since 1880), James, and William, I like them because they have tradition, important men throughout time have carried these names, including many of my family members. I'm not saying I'm right, but that's my take.

Date: 2009-12-28 03:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stormqueen280.livejournal.com
This. There are popular names and popular names. I'd never ever EVER use Nevaeh because I think it's tacky, but I wouldn't have any problems with Sophia.

However, sometimes I grow tired of a name. Sophia is a good example - it has been my number one for a long time, but now it has been replaced. It's still one of my favorites, but not the absolute favorite. Maybe it's because I've heard it a lot, maybe there's another reason, I don't know. In a year, my number one may be a completely different name.

Date: 2009-12-28 04:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarahness.livejournal.com
I'd rather my kid not be one of 10 in her graduating class with the same name, is all.

Except I didn't realize how quickly Amelia was rising in popularity when I named her, so I might have that problem anyway. :(

But no, I don't automatically hate a name just because it is popular. Elizabeth was my #2 name, and it's ranked at #10 on the SSA list.

Date: 2009-12-28 04:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cathblue7.livejournal.com
Three of four of my friends' children have rather unusual names...

Annik (g)
Miquel (b)
Ella (g)
Quynn (g)

Date: 2009-12-28 04:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stormqueen280.livejournal.com
Those are more unusual spellings than unusual names. And Ella was number 19 last year.
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>
Page generated Jan. 25th, 2026 01:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios