[identity profile] arbus.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] babynames
the husband and i have been tossing around our love of the name josie.

its our absolute number one girls name now. we both absolutely ADORE it. however, we cannot decide if we would like to just name our first girl josie, or something longer. i am normally all for that, and he feels that way too. i dont know, i am just feeling a bit off about it i guess because i am not particularly in love with any of the longer versions.

i do LOVE LOVE LOVE josephine, however middle name will be colleen. so obviously thats an issue.

i hate the name jocelyn.

recently, he brought up josette. i like josette. i have already agreed to josette. the husband loves it, and cosette was actually always on our list, so i already liked a name very similar. however, i am NOT in love with it.

kind of rambling (sorry) but has anyone here named their child a name they werent in love with, because they loved the nickname? did you grow to love it? or will i regret it enormously?

ETA: for those wondering, its not made up
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Date: 2009-10-21 06:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holidaylights.livejournal.com
I don't have any kids, but have you considered Josephina?

Date: 2009-10-21 07:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sugar-aplomb.livejournal.com
I know this wasn't your question, but what about Josanna (or a variant)?

I think Josie can stand alone and be carried from infancy through adulthood, but Josette is pretty, and may grow on you. Best wishes, whatever you choose.

Date: 2009-10-21 08:58 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-10-21 09:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lustdumpster.livejournal.com
eh i'd just use josie. reasoning being that it's one of those -ie names that can stand alone, whereas josette is sort of uncommon (i think, anyway. i've never heard it before your post) so if i saw it on a business card, my attention would still focus like "josette? that's new."

Date: 2009-10-21 10:15 am (UTC)
celestinenox: (Default)
From: [personal profile] celestinenox
I've always been the type of person to say if you're going to call your child something, you might as well just legally name them that. It can be very confusing for a child to grow up being called one thing, and then suddenly be taught to spell something else when they're old enough to learn to spell their name and write it. Or, worse, they're taught to spell a shortened version, then when they grow up and have to sign legal documents, they're technically committing fraud by not signing their full name, because they were never taught to. I actually ran into a kid in my job last week who was literally unable to spell his full name, Christopher.

I dunno. Beyond the legal issues, it's just never name much sense to me to name your child something when you fully intend to call them something else.

Date: 2009-10-21 10:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] penguiny7.livejournal.com
I kind of had this problem. I loved Ben and while I liked Benjamin, I didn't love it. But we named our son Benjamin anyway and it's perfect for him and I'd never change it.

I think Josie is much too cutesy and insubstantial to be a name on its own. Is it possible to add a second middle name to throw off the rhyminess of Josephine Colleen? That's what I'd do if I were in your shoes.

Otherwise, some more ideas:
Josephina, Josepha, Josiane, and maybe Jocasta or Joyce? I think Josephina is a good option. It's almost the same as Josephine, but gets rid of the rhyming problem.

Date: 2009-10-21 12:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pegasus2o5.livejournal.com
I'm not normally a proponent of nicknames as full names, but in this case I think it might be your best option. Josie stands on its own pretty well, and she'll think of Josie as her "real" name anyway, probably.

On the other hand, instead of Josephine Colleen, what about Josephine Colette?

Date: 2009-10-21 01:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tinylegacies.livejournal.com
I think Josie can stand well enough on its own, but I think Josette Colleen would work nicely if you're dead set on not using it alone.

Date: 2009-10-21 02:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] th3-unicorn.livejournal.com
I've heard Colleen pronounced as COLL-een not Coll-EEN, so maybe that way it wouldn't rhyme as much?
I'm personally a big fan of Josephine, but not Colleen.
Josephina Colleen is a really nice suggestion and I second it.

Josette is really awkward and if you're not even totally sold on it, I woulnd't advise it.

Date: 2009-10-21 02:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] loanwords.livejournal.com
I agree with an above poster about Josepha. Or maybe even Josephina. The added a makes it less eeeeeeeeeeeeeee sounding with the middle name.

Date: 2009-10-21 02:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] winninghearts.livejournal.com
Honestly, if you really love Josephine, I think naming your baby Josephine Colleen is not the worst thing in the world. I don't think it sounds too bad, actually. And she won't go by her firstnamemiddlename, so I think you should go with the first name you like best.

Date: 2009-10-21 03:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandtree.livejournal.com
How about adding another middle name in there? So instead of just Josephine Colleen, it could be something like Josephine Mary Colleen LastName. It's kind of a lot of name, but it wouldn't rhyme so much.

Date: 2009-10-21 04:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hwar.livejournal.com
I also think Josie is fine on its own. However, Josette is actually really cute and unique. I like it a lot. Also has additional nickname potential with Etta, if she grew up and didn't like Josie.
Edited Date: 2009-10-21 04:08 pm (UTC)

Date: 2009-10-21 04:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] winninghearts.livejournal.com
I think especially when you put the last name on there it won't sound bad. It's one thing to give a baby a first name and last name that kind of rhyme, but first and middle aren't too bad at all.
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>
Page generated Jan. 25th, 2026 10:44 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios