I like Ellis (and it also has the nn Ellie if the girl hated it/was really feminine, etc). Currer is a bit hard to say, but I don't think I would hate it if I met someone with the name.
Currer Ellis...isn't that what Charlotte Bronte went as before she was allowed to publish as herself? Other than that, I don't like Currer, but Ellis is actually kind of cute.
Horrifying. Ellis would be all right for a boy. But neither is appropriate for a girl. Currer? What is that? It sounds like a surname to me. I dislike surnames as given names.
Charlotte Bronte published her books as Currer Bell, Emily Bronte as Ellis Bell. They were meant to be androgynous. while I generally agree with you on Ellis being better for a boy, I wouldn't like to name my boy after a female author (same as I wouldn't want to name my girl after a male author). not that I want to name my children Currer or Ellis, I just wanted opinions:)
oh, of course not together. I'm not really planning on naming any future children these names, I just wanted opinions. I do like Acton, but haven't read Anne's book, so I didn't include it.
Currer will be teased rotten and nicknamed something cruel to do with curry, horses or both (in jokes can be funny, but get stale very quickly for something the child have to live with)
Ellis is fine (the medieval mystery writer Ellis Peters was a woman, real name Edith) but I don't see it cool, it's rather a weak sound after all.
Highly educated people and literature buffs will think it's trying way too hard, and others who don't understand the reference will think, "Those girls have the weirdest names, WTF!"
Ellis is okay, but Currer is hideous and kind of awkward to say.
Individually, I don't think they're pretentious, but if you used them together (first & middle name), or as a sibling set, people who got the reference would probably think you were trying too hard.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 09:45 pm (UTC)Ellis is fine (the medieval mystery writer Ellis Peters was a woman, real name Edith) but I don't see it cool, it's rather a weak sound after all.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-18 01:51 am (UTC)Highly educated people and literature buffs will think it's trying way too hard, and others who don't understand the reference will think, "Those girls have the weirdest names, WTF!"
no subject
Date: 2009-10-18 05:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-18 05:59 am (UTC)Individually, I don't think they're pretentious, but if you used them together (first & middle name), or as a sibling set, people who got the reference would probably think you were trying too hard.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-18 07:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-18 07:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-18 04:07 pm (UTC)