[identity profile] schexyschteve.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] babynames
This girl I went to high school with just had b/g twins.

Krystal Ashley (mom)
Rusty (dad)
Jonathon Michael & Elizabeth Marie

WDYT?

I think they're kind of generic, but SO much better than most of what people around here name their kids. I do love Elizabeth.

Date: 2009-08-29 09:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sarahness.livejournal.com
Generic is a good word for them.

I like the names, though. Elizabeth is one of my favorites! I prefer Jonathan spelled that way.

Date: 2009-08-29 10:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ringsandcoffee.livejournal.com
I agree they're generic, but still so refreshing considering trendy alternatives. However, I am sick of Marie as a middle name (along with Ann and Lynn, which is my own MN).

Side note: BSC love!

Date: 2009-08-29 10:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laminy.livejournal.com
They are generic, and not only that, I don't actually like any of the names.

Date: 2009-08-30 01:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sheisgone.livejournal.com
Generic yes, but I love them. I would use these names.

Date: 2009-08-30 11:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] corielcries.livejournal.com
I wouldn't have used that spelling of the boy name, but compared to what their parents were named, they got it pretty good!

Date: 2009-09-01 12:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fleckerbug.livejournal.com
Pretty generic, but they got off a hell of a lot better than their parents!!

Date: 2009-09-01 09:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bluedano.livejournal.com
This was my thought too. With names like Krystal Ashley and Rusty, is it any wonder they wanted their kids to have "boring" generic names?
Page generated Jan. 26th, 2026 11:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios