(no subject)
Sep. 30th, 2008 01:10 amOk, so, I don't know if you're familiar with royal families and such, but the daughter of the Norwegian king (she doesn't have a title anymore as she married "a commoner") just had her third baby girl yesterday. They named her Emma Tallulah.
I'm officially ashamed of being a norwegian citizen (ok, maybe not really) But seriously. Tallulah? yikes.
The big sisters of this little baby with the hideous name (sorry) is Maud Angelica and Leah Isadora. I remember when Maud Angelica was born I was so pissed off that they gave her the name Angelica, because that was one of my favorite names at the time and I absolutely detest the royal family.
No offence if anyone actually likes the name, but I personally find it extremely hideous and had to come here to tell you guys.
I'm officially ashamed of being a norwegian citizen (ok, maybe not really) But seriously. Tallulah? yikes.
The big sisters of this little baby with the hideous name (sorry) is Maud Angelica and Leah Isadora. I remember when Maud Angelica was born I was so pissed off that they gave her the name Angelica, because that was one of my favorite names at the time and I absolutely detest the royal family.
No offence if anyone actually likes the name, but I personally find it extremely hideous and had to come here to tell you guys.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 03:23 pm (UTC)I think Maud Angelica and Emma Tallulah are both ok, but definitely not my style.
I will never see the appeal of Tallulah, it just sounds like something a baby learning its first words would 'say'. I hope that makes sense.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 03:51 pm (UTC)Oh man. This suddenly got funnier.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 04:18 pm (UTC)Emma Tallulah is pretty flouncy, you'd never see that on a British royal.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 04:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 04:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 04:44 pm (UTC)I don't like Maud, but I like Angelica. I love Isadora, and Leah is fine on its own, but I don't like them together.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 05:40 pm (UTC)I'm with those who like it in theory (it's cute, and I love Lulu as a nn), but I don't think it works on a real child. Maybe a character...
Although I've gotta say, it's way better than Maud Angelica. None of these names flow at all, especially that one. =/
no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 06:51 pm (UTC)Emma and Leah sound really good together, but I think Maud sounds kind of odd as a part of that sibset.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-29 07:39 pm (UTC)I Like Leah Isadora too.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 07:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 01:50 am (UTC)The fact that she married Ari Behn doesn't make her more sane either, so I'm not surprised, just disappointed.
At least Haakon Magnus and Mette Marit picked some decent names!