Names with negative connotations
May. 2nd, 2007 04:58 pmThis post brought to you by the recent obsession with the name Loki.
Does anyone actually read the mythology behind Loki? He is one nasty, evil god. Why would you want to name yout kid that? Even if you just view him as a necessary trickster/badguy in the lore, he still ends up chained to a rock with his son's entrails and venom dripping onto his face. He gets to stay like that until the end of the world, according to the mythology. What a lovely story to tell your kid about his name.
I, for one, could never give a child a name with a historically negative connotation. Juliet even bugs me because she does (spoiler!) kill herself at the end of the play, after all. Ophelia, same sort of issue. Damian, Lucifer, and related names are all awful in my opinion and should doom the parents to a hellion of a child. (Don't anyone get the idea that Hellion's a lovely name.) Same with Adolf.
If Lolita's okay (not that I think so) then why aren't people offering up Humbert as a boy's name? Humbert Humbert is a great literary figure, after all. And Bert is such a nice nickname.
So in conclusion:
1) What's your opinion on using names with negative backgrounds?
2) Any other good examples of names with bad history?
Does anyone actually read the mythology behind Loki? He is one nasty, evil god. Why would you want to name yout kid that? Even if you just view him as a necessary trickster/badguy in the lore, he still ends up chained to a rock with his son's entrails and venom dripping onto his face. He gets to stay like that until the end of the world, according to the mythology. What a lovely story to tell your kid about his name.
I, for one, could never give a child a name with a historically negative connotation. Juliet even bugs me because she does (spoiler!) kill herself at the end of the play, after all. Ophelia, same sort of issue. Damian, Lucifer, and related names are all awful in my opinion and should doom the parents to a hellion of a child. (Don't anyone get the idea that Hellion's a lovely name.) Same with Adolf.
If Lolita's okay (not that I think so) then why aren't people offering up Humbert as a boy's name? Humbert Humbert is a great literary figure, after all. And Bert is such a nice nickname.
So in conclusion:
1) What's your opinion on using names with negative backgrounds?
2) Any other good examples of names with bad history?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 09:26 pm (UTC)Another name I feel this way about is Delilah. She is not a good character in the Bible, and that name will never have anything but negative connotations to me. Again, beautiful name, bad connotation. I guess this partly depends on your upbringing, though. People who weren't raised hearing Bible stories probably don't have a problem with the name.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 09:28 pm (UTC)Personally, I think that if the name is immediately associated with something bad, that it probably shouldn't be used. The thing with 'Loki' though, is that SO MANY people have used it that it's almost become a cute, trickster name rather than really accurate to the myths. I think once a name moves beyond just it's original source, it's okay to use, though if it's still very associated with something (like Adolf) then it should really be avoided.
I can't really think of any names with a terrible history/association at the moment, though I know there are some good ones. Hannibal, maybe? XD
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 09:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 09:49 pm (UTC)I like the name Lucian. Lucifer's a stretch, but it still has a nice meaning. Lucian shares the meaning and it has a much more pleasing sound to it.
I couldn't name a child Lucius though, because I'm a Harry Potter fan.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 09:53 pm (UTC)I think the name Loki is fairly good. Although it would infuriate me if people didn't know the real story behind Loki. Same as I pretty much murdered someone that called their girl 'Kali' just because it was a cute way of spelling it.
I once met someone called Macbeth (as a first name) and figured they were pretty much damned from birth.
If it's to do with person-that-names-stupidity, it's to do with education. If people were AWARE that Loki etc had bad connotations, then they may not choose them. But all the power to them if they do know and still choose it.
I know two Damians, and a Robert Damian and they all LOVE their names, because of the connotation.
I don't think it has much to do with your upbringing. I was brought up on bible stories and you could call your child 'Jeebus' and I wouldn't give a monkeys.
Each to his own I suppose.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 09:59 pm (UTC)So, I think it upholds my point, actually. Of course people with awful names aren't automatically awful people, but they certainly are cursed if they are sweet people with a name that makes everyone else think of evil.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:04 pm (UTC)Lolita is such a pretty name, but the obvious would keep me from ever using it.
Ophelia (or rather, Ofelia) is beautiful but has awful connotations.
I also like the name Snow, but it sounds so trashy.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:06 pm (UTC)And I think Humbert is an awful name. ;)
Juliet isn't so bad, not as bad as Ophelia. Probably because of all the similar names (Julia, Julianna/Juliana/Julianne, Julie).
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:08 pm (UTC)It does have the same roots as evangelical (bringing/bearer of good news) so your dislike is understandable.
So why do you like Loki even with the back story? Friendly curiosity, not attacking, promise. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:16 pm (UTC)Just had this discussion with my housemates and one is going to call her kids cthulhu, lucifer, demonia and decandence.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:17 pm (UTC)When I was younger I liked the name Aurora until my mom told me it reminded her of toilet paper.
And I liked the name Claudia until I found out it means "lame" or "crippled." I also feel obligated to share that with anyone else who likes this name haha.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:18 pm (UTC)Delilah is the name that gets me everytime, because it's a giant, flashing sign screaming "whore." Tristan and Isolde annoy me as well, but less people know about their myth, so it's not that bad.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:20 pm (UTC)And all the other spellings of it.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:27 pm (UTC)Romeo and Juliet overcame the name, and fell in love. Yeah, they had to kill themselves to be together but the plan was nearly in fruition when Romeo cocked it up.
I think as long as you know all the different ideologies, mythologies and other ologies behind a name, and you can either justify the name, or can overcome the context, then any name is suitable.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-02 10:29 pm (UTC)